In a stunning and bold declaration, prominent figures Whoopi Goldberg and Megan Rapinoe have announced their intentions to leave the United States, citing a lack of respect and the growing challenges they face in their careers and personal lives. The two outspoken activists and public figures have stirred considerable attention with their comments, which highlight their discontent with the state of American society and politics.

Whoopi Goldberg, renowned actress, comedian, and co-host of *The View*, has long been a vocal advocate for social justice, often using her platform to discuss issues such as race, gender, and equality. However, in recent months, Goldberg has expressed increasing frustration with the political climate in the U.S., which she believes has become divisive and hostile to individuals like herself who speak out on important issues.

In a candid interview, Goldberg revealed that her decision to leave the country was a response to what she perceives as a lack of respect for her views and contributions. “We don’t get respect here,” Goldberg said, referring to the obstacles she faces as a Black woman in the entertainment industry and as a progressive voice in a polarized society. The 68-year-old actress has been outspoken about issues such as racism, inequality, and women’s rights, and her frustration with the growing culture wars in the U.S. has led her to consider leaving the country entirely.

Megan Rapinoe, the celebrated U.S. soccer star and outspoken LGBTQ+ advocate, has similarly voiced her disillusionment with the direction of American politics. Known for her activism on issues of gender equality, racial justice, and LGBTQ+ rights, Rapinoe has long been a target of right-wing criticism, particularly after kneeling during the national anthem in protest of racial inequality.

Rapinoe’s decision to leave the U.S. comes after years of facing public backlash for her stances on social justice issues. In a statement shared on social media, she expressed feeling alienated by the country’s growing political divisions and its unwillingness to embrace progress on equality and human rights. “I can’t keep fighting for a place that doesn’t respect my values,” Rapinoe said. Her comments echo her ongoing battle for inclusivity and her frustration with what she describes as a hostile environment for activists and people who push for systemic change.

Goldberg and Rapinoe’s decision to leave the U.S. marks a significant moment in their careers as they both have been prominent figures in American culture and activism. Their combined influence in entertainment and sports has sparked widespread conversations about the challenges faced by public figures who challenge the status quo. Both women have experienced immense pressure due to their outspoken views, with critics accusing them of being divisive or unpatriotic for their activism.

The idea of leaving the country is not one taken lightly, especially for two women whose careers have been built on advocating for change and standing up for marginalized communities. Their departure could send a powerful message about the current climate of political and cultural polarization in the U.S. As figures who have fought for progress, their decision underscores the personal toll that sustained public criticism and systemic resistance to change can take.

Goldberg and Rapinoe’s departure from the U.S. could have a profound effect on how their activism is perceived by the public. Supporters of both women have expressed sympathy for their decision, arguing that the current political environment makes it increasingly difficult for progressive voices to thrive. However, their critics might see their departure as an abandonment of their responsibility to continue advocating for change within the U.S. borders.

There are also broader implications for the ongoing debate over celebrity activism. Critics have long argued that celebrities who use their platforms to speak on political issues are out of touch with the average American citizen. The departure of figures like Goldberg and Rapinoe may only fuel these arguments, with detractors accusing them of fleeing rather than continuing the fight for change.

While both Goldberg and Rapinoe have made it clear that they will not be leaving the fight for social justice behind, their decision to leave the U.S. signals a shift toward global activism. For both women, the idea of advocating for change on an international scale may offer new opportunities to connect with like-minded individuals in more progressive environments. By stepping outside the constraints of the American political system, they could broaden their efforts to promote equality and justice worldwide.

Their departure could also highlight the growing trend of individuals choosing to relocate to countries with more progressive policies, such as those that embrace LGBTQ+ rights, racial equality, and women’s rights. Goldberg and Rapinoe may find greater alignment with countries that prioritize these issues and are more receptive to their activism.

Whoopi Goldberg and Megan Rapinoe’s decision to leave the United States marks a significant moment in both of their careers and for American activism. Their frustrations with the political and social climate reflect the challenges many public figures and activists face when their voices are not heard or respected. While their departure may be seen as a loss for American activism, it also sends a clear message about the toll of sustained political polarization and public scrutiny.

As they seek new opportunities to continue their work, Goldberg and Rapinoe’s decision will undoubtedly spark ongoing conversations about the future of activism, celebrity influence, and the role of public figures in challenging the status quo. Whether they return to the U.S. or continue their efforts on a global stage, their impact on social justice issues will continue to resonate.

**SEO Keywords**: Whoopi Goldberg, Megan Rapinoe, leave America, political activism, celebrity activism, social justice, LGBTQ+ rights, gender equality, public figures, U.S. politics, progressive values.